vs
An everyday Loom replacement needs to record the screen and microphone, produce a playable share link and support feedback. Check privacy settings, retention and your sharing workflow separately from headline plan prices.
OpenLoom
Reviewed 2026-10-28| Dimension | Loom | OpenLoom |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow | asynchronous screen recording and video sharing | Self-hosted browser screen recording with links that viewers can open. |
| Price model | Free Starter and paid subscription plans | free |
| License | Proprietary product/service under vendor terms | AGPL-3.0 |
| Platform | Desktop recorder, browser extension and browser playback | web Source |
| Self-hosting | Vendor-hosted service; local clients are documented separately | yes Source |
| AI contribution | Not assessed for the original product | claimed |
| Readiness | Not assessed | released |
When to explore OpenLoom.
OpenLoom documents the core asynchronous video workflow: record a screen and optional webcam in the browser, process the recording and share a playback link. Its source includes recording, upload, FFmpeg composition, object storage and a public watch page. The maker explicitly says the project was built entirely through vibe coding in Cursor.
What to check first.
Requires an operated Linux server, Docker, a domain and HTTPS. Trimming, timestamped comments, a browser extension and team workspaces are listed as future work; transcription is not presented as a finished feature. Existing Loom libraries are not documented as directly importable. Core behavior is source-documented rather than independently runtime-tested.
Work on a copy of a representative file. Compare screen recording, shareable playback, viewer feedback against your actual requirements, then inspect the final output in the tool used by your collaborators.